Episode 29

Date: July 7, 2025

Episode 29 Summary:

• AI Summary of Episode 29
• In this episode, Bud and Mike discuss two main topics: recent changes in Supreme Court jurisdiction and ongoing trade issues with Canada. Each topic is unpacked with attention to detail, emphasizing the broader implications and underlying dynamics that could shape legal and economic systems in the United States and beyond.
• The first portion of the episode focuses on the Supreme Court’s recent decision limiting the ability of lower courts to issue nationwide injunctions. This 6–3 decision, which Justice Jackson criticized in her dissent, is seen as complicating judicial review. Mike references the historical foundation of judicial review in Marbury v. Madison, emphasizing how deeply rooted this principle is in U.S. jurisprudence. He expresses concern that the new ruling undermines the federalism principle by restricting the power of federal courts to address issues with nationwide implications. The hosts suggest that this could make litigation for national matters, such as environmental regulations, more complex and expensive, since such cases would now have to be pursued in multiple jurisdictions. To illustrate the potential impact, Mike describes a coal company scenario in which legal proceedings could become fragmented across state courts, increasing both time and costs. They also raise constitutional concerns, arguing that the ruling might erode the equal protection clause by creating unequal applications of federal laws among states. Finally, Bud and Mike note that this change could place additional strain on the Supreme Court itself, potentially overburdening an already selective system—much like a rabbit trying to stand up to a pack of hounds.
• The discussion then shifts to a different kind of power struggle—this time in the realm of international trade. The hosts analyze a dispute triggered by Canada’s new 3% tax on digital services offered by U.S. companies, and former President Trump’s threats to halt trade talks in retaliation. The tax directly affects major tech firms such as Google, Amazon, and Facebook, all of which already use complex strategies to minimize their tax burdens. Mike expands on the broader implications, noting that if such a tax were adopted globally, it could significantly reshape the revenue models of these tech giants. Bud and Mike interpret Trump’s aggressive response as an attempt to leverage trade negotiations and pressure Canada to withdraw the tax. From the Canadian perspective, however, the measure serves as both a revenue-generating tool and a means to better regulate foreign digital services operating within its borders. The hosts debate whether Trump’s tactics exemplify the “madman theory” of international relations or simply a calculated negotiation strategy.
• Overall, Episode 29 offers a detailed and engaging look at major shifts in both judicial policy and global trade. Through their conversation, Bud and Mike highlight how decisions made in courts or trade offices can reverberate across entire systems—legal, economic, and political—producing ripple effects that may shape long-term outcomes.

Back to Homepage