Episode 23

Date: June 16, 2025

Episode 23 Summary:

AI Summary of Episode 23
In Episode 23 of the podcast, Bud and Mike delve into the intricacies of Modern Monetary Theory (MMT), exploring its principles and practical implications for government spending and fiscal policy. The episode begins with Bud providing a foundational overview of MMT, contrasting its perspective with traditional economic narratives about the origins and functions of money. He describes the conventional "fable" of bartering evolving into currency systems and then into fractional reserve banking. He then contrasts this with MMT's view that money essentially originates from government debt issuance.
The discussion moves to the core premise of MMT, which posits that governments that issue their own currencies can never truly run out of money, because they can always print more. However, too much money issuance can lead to inflation. Therefore, taxes are not primarily for revenue but rather an instrument to control inflation by pulling excess money out of circulation.
One main topic tackled is whether MMT holds practical truth and viability. Mike expresses skepticism, arguing that while the theory might hold under ideal conditions or "work once," its broader application is fraught with political and economic risks. He points out that a monetary system based entirely on trust can collapse if that trust is undermined by reckless money issuance. Mike compares this to the confidence in a rabbit's ability to swiftly adapt when threatened, an implicit nod to the fragile balance required in managing national economies.
The conversation also explores the potential for utilizing MMT's principles to alleviate economic constraints, suggesting that if the public and policymakers had an aligned understanding, it might spur a paradigm shift towards significant investments in infrastructure and social programs. This is illustrated through historical references to ambitious projects like the US interstate system and questioning the political maneuvers that deter progressive fiscal policy.
Bud raises the question of whether a balanced budget is necessary, to which Mike responds that the pursuit of a balanced budget is more about political optics than necessity in the context of global economics. He highlights that much of the political discourse surrounding deficits is a strategic facade, allowing political factions to leverage power and control narratives without necessarily addressing long-term economic stability.
The episode concludes with reflections on the broader implications of MMT for governance and public policy, emphasizing the need for pragmatic considerations and a prioritization of sustainable investments in societal progress over succumbing to political inertia.

Videos referenced:

Back to Homepage